Annotation guidelines
shared task on automatic identification of verbal MWEs - edition 1.0 (2017)

---

Inherently reflexive verbs (IReflV)

Reflexive clitics (RCLI) are clitic pronouns that refer to the subject of the verb, like oneself in English. They are very common in many languages and play several semantic roles depending on the context, as detailed below.

Reflexive verbs (REFLV), sometimes also called pronominal verbs, are formed by a full verb combined with a RCLI, although the clitic does not always have a reflexive meaning. REFLV can be categorized into different classes, some of which should be annotated as verbal MWEs.

Namely, we will only annotate a REFLV as an inherently reflexive verb (IReflV) when (a) it never occurs without the clitic, or (b) the REFLV and non-reflexive versions have clearly different senses or subcategorization frames. Inherently reflexive verb constitute a quasi-universal category.

We start by listing the various categories of REFLV before providing tests to decide whether to annotate a given occurrence as IReflV.

• Inherently reflexive ⇒ ANNOTATE as IReflV
• The verb without the RCLI does not exist
• stydět se to be ashamed, divit se to wonder
• sich schämen to be ashamed, sich wundern to wonder
• suicidarse to suicide, abstenerse to abstain
• s'évanouir to faint, se suicider to suicide
• suicidarsi to suicide, arrabbiarsi to get angry
• dowiedzieć się to find out, bać się to be afraid
• queixar-se to complain, abster-se to abstain
• a se teme to be afraid with obligatory ACC reflexive clitic
  a își însuși to appropriate with obligatory DAT reflexive clitic
• att försova sig to sleep in
  att gifta sig to get married
• sramovati se to be ashamed, bati se to be afraid
• The verb without the RCLI does exist, but has a very different meaning
• sich enthalten ≠ enthalten to abstain ≠ to contain, sich (um etw.) handeln ≠ handeln to be ≠ to handle
• recoger ≠ recogerse to gather ≠ to go home, empeñar ≠ empeñarse to pawn ≠ to insist
• s'apercevoir ≠ apercevoir to realize ≠ to see, s'agir ≠ agir to be ≠ to act
• riferire ≠ riferirsi to report, tell ≠ to refer
• znajdować ≠ znajdować się to find ≠ to be, radzić ≠ radzić sobie to advise ≠ to manage
• encontrar-se ≠ encontrar to be ≠ to meet, referir-se ≠ referir to concern ≠ to refer
• a se îndura ≠ a îndura to have the heart ≠ to suffer
  a se face≠ a face to become ≠ to make even if it is inchoative (Dindelegan 2013: 79) a se face (=to become) is IReflV (it passes Test15)
• att känna sig ledsen/arg to feel sad/angry ≠ to touch
• tikati se česa ≠ tikati to concern ≠ to refer, pobrati se ≠ pobrati to stand up ≠ to pick up
• Reciprocal ⇒ NOT ANNOTATED
• The RCLI has a sense of mutually:
• líbat se to kiss each other, potkávat se to meet each other
• sich küssen to kiss each other, sich treffen to meet each other
• besarse to kiss each other, verse to see each other
• s'embrasser to kiss each other, se rencontrer to meet each other
• baciarsi to kiss each other
• całować się to kiss each other, spotykać się to meet each other
• cumprimentar-se to greet each other, ver-se to see each other
• a se saluta to greet each other
• poljubljati se to kiss each other, srečati se to meet each other
• Reflexive ⇒ NOT ANNOTATED
• The RCLI marks the reflexive or reciprocal construction, that is, the clitic plays the role of self in English
• mýt se to wash oneself, drbat se to scratch oneself
• sich waschen to wash oneself, sich kratzen to scratch oneself
• mirarse to look at oneself, vestirse to dress oneself
• se laver to wash oneself, se parler to talk to oneself
• lavarsi to wash oneself, vestirsi to dress oneself
• myć się to wash oneself, drapać się po głowie to scratch oneself on the head
• apressar-se to hurry oneself, vestir-se to dress oneself
• a se spăla to wash oneself
• att tvätta sig to wash oneself
• umivati se to wash oneself, praskati se to scratch oneself
• Body part, also called possessive reflexive ⇒ NOT ANNOTATED
• Specific type of reflexive use in which the direct object is a body part or, more generally, an inalienable part of the subject
• mýt si nohy wash RCLI.DAT the feet wash one's feet
• sich das Bein brechen RCLI the leg break break one's leg
• rascarse el brazo scratch.RCLI the arm scratch one's arm
• se gratter la tête RCLI scratch the head scratch one's head
• grattarsi la testa RCLI scratch the head scratch one's head
• myć sobie nogi wash RCLI.DAT the feet wash one's feet
• impossible, uses possessive instead
• a-şi rupe mâna RCLI.DAT break arm break one's arm
• umivati noge wash RCLI.DAT the feet wash one's feet, zlomiti roko RCLI.DAT break arm break one's arm
• Middle with preverbal subject, also called synthetic passive ⇒ NOT ANNOTATED
• The clitic marks a regular syntactic alternation for transitive verbs. Just like in regular passive alternation, the direct object of the transitive version appears as the subject of the REFLV version, and thus the verb agrees with the subject.
• Differently from inchoative (see below), the subject of the transitive version is absent in the REFLV version but it exists necessarily, though it is underspecified
• die Häuser verkaufen sich gut the houses sell RCLI well the houses sell well
• las casas se venden bien the houses RCLI sell well the houses sell well
• les pots se vendent bien the pots RCLI sell well the pots sell well
• le case si affittano the houses RCLI rent the houses are rented
• domy dobrze się sprzedają houses sell.PL RCLI well houses sell well
• as casas se vendem bem the houses RCLI sell well the houses sell well
• casele se vând bine houses-the RCLI sell well houses sell well
• hiše se dobro prodajajo the houses sell RCLI well the houses sell well
• Middle with postverbal subject, also called synthetic passive ⇒ NOT ANNOTATED
• In some languages, middle alternation with preverbal subject sounds unnatural and middle alternation with postverbal subject is preferred. Depending on the languages, it is viewed as a postverbal subject (ES, PL, PT, RO) or as an object which agrees with the unaccusative verb form (IT). Middle alternation with postverbal subject is impossible in FR and DE.
• se alquilan casas RCLI rent houses people rent houses
• si affittano case RCLI rent houses people rent houses
• dobrze sprzedają się te domy well sell RCLI these houses these houses sell well Polish is a relatively free word-order language and a postverbal subject is a regular (even if stylistically marked) alternation.
• alugam-se casas rent-RCLI houses people rent houses
• se vând bine apartamentele din blocurile noi RCLI sell well apartments-the from blocks-the new Apartments from new blocks sell well
  se construiesc locuințe noi RCLI built houses new new houses are built
• nove hiše se gradijo new houses RCLI built new houses are built
• Impersonal ⇒ NOT ANNOTATED
• The RCLI marks an impersonal verb alternation possible for various transitivity classes, depending on the language: only transitive verbs (FR), only intransitive verbs with manner adjuncts (DE), preferably intransitive but tolerated for transitive verbs (PT), either transitive or intransitive verbs (IT, ES, RO, PL)
• There is no noun phrase before the verb (empty subject slot), the presence of the RCLI indicates a verb interpreted with a generic and underspecified subject
• The verb is in third person singular, even when the object is plural
• hier tanzt es sich gut here dances it RCLI well people dance well here
• se busca a actores RCLI searches to actors people look for actors
  se trabaja mejor aquí RCLI works better here people work better here
• il se dit des bêtises it RCLI says silly things people say silly things
• si lavora troppo RCLI works too much people work too much
  si affitta molte case RCLI rents many houses people rent many houses
• za dużo się pracuje too much RCLI works people work too much
  bzdury się opowiada nonsense RCLI tells people tell nonsense
• dorme-se muito sleeps-RCLI much people sleep a lot
  conta-se histórias tells-RCLI stories people tell stories Transitive impersonal is considered wrong by traditional grammar but it is found in corpora.
• se lucrează până târziu RCLI works until late people work until late transitive verbs can be impersonal in RO only when they are null-object verbs (se lucrează până târziu - *este lucrat până târziu) or when their subject is realized by a clause headed by a complementizer Dindelegan 2013: 174
  se suferă din cauza sărăciei RCLI suffer because of poverty one suffers because of poverty RO impersonal reflexive verbs are mostly intransitive Dindelegan 2013: 173
  se aleargă dimineața RCLI run in the morning people run in the morning
• govori se/govorijo se neumnosti it says/they say RCLI silly things people say silly things
• Inchoative ⇒ NOT ANNOTATED
• Similar to middle, but the RCLI marks a less productive syntactic alternation:
• the direct object of the transitive version appears as subject of the REFLV
• the subject of the transitive version is not only absent, it is also semantically unclear or nonexistent
• dveře se otvírají the door opens
• die Tür öffnet sich the door opens
• la puerta se abrió the door opened
• la porte s'est subitement ouverte the door suddenly opened
• la porta si apre the door opens
• drzwi się otwierają the door opens
• o vaso se quebrou the vase broke
• mașina s-a stricat the car broke down
  ușa s-a deschis the door opened
• dörren öppnar sig the door opens
• vrata se odpirajo the door opens

IReflV-specific decision tree

• Apply test 14 - [INHERENT]
• Annotate as IReflV
• Apply test 15 - [DIFF-SENSE]
• Annotate as IReflV
• Apply test 16 - [DIFF-SUBCAT]
• Annotate as IReflV
• verb has no subject ⇒ Apply test 17 - [IMPERS]
• It is not a VMWE, exit
• Annotate as IReflV
• verb has a subject ⇒ Apply test 18 - [MIDDLE-INCHO]
• It is not a VMWE, exit
• Apply test 19 - [REFL]
• It is not a VMWE, exit
• subject is SINGULAR ⇒ Apply test 20 - [REFL-MUTUAL]
• It is not a VMWE, exit
• Annotate as IReflV
• subject is PLURAL ⇒ Apply test 21 - [RECIPRO]
• It is not a VMWE, exit
• Annotate as IReflV

Test 14 - [INHERENT] Inherent clitic

Does the verb only exist with the RCLI and never occurs without it?

• annotate as IReflV
• sich schämen ⇒ *schämen to be ashamed
  sich wundern ⇒ *wundern to wonder
• suicidarse ⇒ *suicidar to suicide
  abstenerse ⇒ *abstener to abstain
• s'évanouir ⇒ *évanouir to faint
  se suicider ⇒ *suicider to suicide
• suicidarsi ⇒ *suicidare to suicide
• dowiedzieć się ⇒ *dowiedzieć to find out
  bać się ⇒ *bać to be afraid
• queixar-se ⇒ *queixar to complain
  abster-se ⇒ *abster to abstain
• a se teme ⇒ *a teme to be afraid
  a își însuși ⇒ *a însuși to appropriate
• sramovati se ⇒ *sramovati to be ashamed
  čuditi se ⇒ *čuditi to wonder
• next test

Test 15 - [DIFF-SENSE] - Different sense

Given the same verb without the RCLI, are all of its meanings clearly different from the REFLV form?

• annotate as IReflV
• sich verstehen ≠ verstehen to get along well ≠ to understand
• recogerse ≠ recoger to go home ≠ to pick up, to gather
• s'apercevoir ≠ apercevoir to realize ≠ to see
  s'agir ≠ agir to be ≠ to act
• riferirsi ≠ riferire to refer ≠ to report, to tell
• znajdować się ≠ znajdować to find oneself ≠ to be
• encontrar-se ≠ encontrar to be ≠ to meet
  referir-se ≠ referir to concern ≠ to refer
• a se îndura ≠ a îndura to have the heart to ≠ to suffer
• razumeti se ≠ razumeti to get along well ≠ to understand
• next test

Test 16 - [DIFF-SUBCAT] - Different subcategorization frame

Is the subcategorization frame of the simple verb without the RCLI different from the subcategorization frame of the REFLV, except for the addition of a direct or indirect object corresponding to the same argument as the RCLI in the REFLV version?

• annotate as IReflV
• X verliert sich in Y ⇔ X verliert Y X looses RCLI in Y ⇔ X looses Y
• X se olvidó de Y ⇔ X olvidó Y X RCLI forgot of Y ⇔ X forgot Y
• X se confesse de Y ⇔ X confesse Y (but *X confesse de Y) X RCLI confesses of Y ⇔ X confesses Y (but not *X confesses of Y)
  X se plaint de Z ⇒ *Y plaint (à) X de Z X RCLI complains of Z ⇒ *Y complains (to) X of Z → the verb without RCLI, plus direct or indirect object. does not subcategorize for the PP with preposition de
  X se refuse à Vinf ⇒ *Y refuse (à) X à Vinf X RCLI refuses to Vinf ⇒ *Y refuses (to) X to Vinf
• X si è dimenticato di Y ⇔ X ha dimenticato Y X RCLI forgot of Y ⇔ X forgot Y
• X tłumaczy się z Y ⇔ X tłumaczy Y X explains SELF of Y ⇔ X explains Y
• X se esqueceu de Y ⇔ X esqueceu Y X RCLI forgot of Y ⇔ X forgot Y
• X se gândeşte la Y ⇔ X gândeşte că Y X RCLI thinks of Y ⇔ X thinks that Y
• next test

Test 17 - [IMPERS] - Impersonal

When you replace the RCLI by an underspecified subject such as one or people, does the sentence keep its meaning?

• do not annotate as verbal MWE
• hier tanzt es sich gut ⇔ hier tanzen die Leute gut people dance well here
• se duerme mucho ⇔ las personas duermen mucho people sleep a lot
  se busca a actores ⇔ la gente busca a actores people look for actors
• il se dit des bêtises ⇔ les personnes disent des bêtises people say silly things
• si dorme molto ⇔ le persone dormono molto people sleep a lot
  si affitta molte case ⇔ le persone affittano molte case people rent many houses
• pracuje się za dużo ⇔ ludzie pracują za dużo people work too much
  opowiada się bzdury ⇔ ludzie opowiadają bzdury people tell nonsense
• dorme-se muito ⇔ as pessoas dormem muito people sleep a lot
  conta-se histórias ⇔ as pessoas contam histórias people tell stories
• se lucrează până târziu ⇔ lumea lucrează până târziu people work until late
  se aleargă dimineața ⇔ lumea aleargă dimineața people run in the morning
• govorijo se neumnosti ⇔ ljudje govorijo neumnosti people tell nonsense
• annotate as IReflV

Test 18 - [MIDDLE-INCHO] - Middle or Inchoative

When you move the subject to the object position, remove the RCLI and add a generic subject (people, somebody), thus building a transitive version, does it imply the REFLV version? In other words, people/somebody V [to] X ⇒ X REFLV?

• do not annotate as verbal MWE
• man kann die Häuser gut verkaufen ⇒ die Häuser verkaufen sich gut people can sell the houses well ⇒ the houses sell well
  jemand öffnet die Tür ⇒ die Tür öffnet sich somebody opens the door ⇒ the door opens
• la gente cuenta historias ⇒ se cuentan historias people tell stories ⇒ stories are told
  alguien abrió la puerta ⇒ la puerta se abrió somebody opened the door ⇒ the door opened
• on vend bien Ce produit ⇒ ce produit se vend bien people sell this product well ⇒ this product sells well
  quelqu'un ouvre la porte ⇒ la porte s'ouvre, somebody opens the door ⇒ the door opens
• qualcuno vende bene questo prodotto ⇒ questo prodotto si vende bene someone people sells this product well ⇒ this product sells well
  qualcuno apre la porta ⇒ la porta si apre somebody opens the door ⇒ the door opens
• ktoś sprzedaje te domy ⇒ te domy się sprzedają somebody sells these houses ⇒ these houses sell well
  ktoś otwiera drzwi ⇒ drzwi się otwierają somebody opens the door ⇒ the door opens
• alguém conta histórias ⇒ contam-se histórias somebody tells stories ⇒ stories are told
  alguém acalmou o menino ⇒ o menino se acalmou somebody calmed the boy down ⇒ the boy calmed down
• cineva spune glume ⇒ se spun glume somebody tells jokes ⇒ jokes are told
  cineva a deschis ușa ⇒ ușa s-a deschis somebody opened the door ⇒ the door opened
• nekdo pripoveduje šale ⇒ šale se pripovedujejo somebody tells jokes ⇒ jokes are told
  nekdo je odprl vrata ⇒ vrata so se odprla somebody opened the door ⇒ the door opened
• next test

Test 19 - [REFL] - Reflexive

When you replace the RCLI by oneself only or to oneself only, does it imply the REFLV version? In other words, X V [to] himself only ⇒ X REFLV?

• do not annotate as verbal MWE
• Paul kratzt nur sich selbst ⇒ Paul kratzt sich Paul scratches himself
• Pablo se lava a sí mismo ⇒ Pablo se lava Paul washes himself
• Paul ne soigne que lui-même ⇒ Paul se soigne Paul heals himself
  Paul ne parle qu'à lui-même ⇒ Paul se parle Paul talks to himself
• Paolo cura solo se stesso ⇒ Paolo si cura Paul heals himself
  Paolo parla solo a se stesso ⇒ Paolo si parla Paul talks to himself
• Paweł leczy tylko siebie ⇒ Paweł leczy się Paul heals himself
• Paulo só lava a si mesmo ⇒ Paulo se lava Paul washes himself
• Paul se spală doar pe sine ⇒ Paul se spală. Paul washes himself
• Pavel praska samo sebe ⇒ Pavel se praska Paul scratches himself
• next test
• The subject is singular: test REFL-MUTUAL
• The subject is plural or coordinated (Bob and Alice): test RECIPRO

Test 20 - [REFL-MUTUAL] - Reflexive-mutual

Is a reciprocal version possible? Namely: Is it acceptable to replace the singular subject by a plural and add each other to the REFLV form without changing the REFLV's meaning?

• do not annotate as verbal MWE The test applies only if test 15 has failed. For example, for "X se marie" 'X gets married' in French, it is odd though possible to say 'X and Y marry each other', but this does not mean 'X gets married', because it is only possible if X and Y are marriage officiants
• Paul wäscht sich ⇔ Sie waschen sich gegenseitig / einander they wash each other
• Pablo se lava ⇔ ellos se lavan mutuamente / los unos a los otros they wash each other
• Paul se lave ⇔ ils se lavent mutuellement / les uns les autres they wash each other
• Paolo si lava ⇔ essi si lavano reciprocamente / l'un l'altro they wash each other
• Paweł się myje ⇔ oni myją się nawzajem they wash each other
• Paulo se lava ⇔ eles se lavam mutuamente / uns aos outros they wash each other
• el se spală ⇔ ei se spală unul pe altul they wash each other
• Pavel se umiva ⇔ umivajo drug drugega they wash each other
• annotate as IReflV

Test 21 - [RECIPRO] - Reciprocal

Is it possible to remove the RCLI and replace the coordinated subject (A and B) or plural subject (A.PL) by a singular subject (A or A.PL) and a singular object, often introduced by to/with (B or A.PL), without changing the REFLV's meaning? That is:

• Coordinated subject: A and B PronV ⇔ A V [to/with] B and B V [to/with] A?
• Plural subject: A.PL PronV ⇔ A.PL V [to/with] A.PL?

• do not annotate as verbal MWE
• Paul und Anna umarmen sich ⇔ Paul umarmt Anna and Anna umarmt Paul Paul and Anna hug each other
  die Affen kratzen sich ⇔ die Affen kratzen die Affen the monkeys scratch each other
• Pablo y Ana se abrazan ⇔ Pablo abraza a Ana and Ana abraza a Pablo Paul and Ann hug each other
  los niños se abrazan ⇔ los niños abrazan a los niños the children hug each other
• Paul et Anne s'embrassent ⇔ Paul embrasse Anne and Anne embrasse Paul Paul and Ann kiss
  les jours se suivent ⇔ les jours suivent les jours the days follow each other
• Giovanni e Anna si baciano ⇔ Giovanni bacia Anna and Anna bacia Giovanni John and Ann kiss
  i giorni si seguono ⇔ i giorni seguono i giorni i giorni seguono l'un l'altro
• Paweł i Elena się całują ⇔ Paweł całuje Elenę and Elenę całuje Paweł Paweł and Elena kiss
• João e Ana se beijam ⇔ João beija Ana and Ana beija João John and Ann kiss
  os presos se agridem ⇔ os presos agridem os presos the prisoners aggress each other
• Ion şi George se salută ⇔ Ion îl salută pe George and George îl salută pe Ion Ion and George greet each other
  participanții se salută ⇔ participanții îi salută pe participanți the participants greet each other
• Pavel in Ana se objemata ⇔ Pavel objema Ano in Ana objema Pavla Paul and Anna hug each other
• annotate as IReflV

Problematic cases and remarks

---